bosswin168 slot gacor 2023
situs slot online
slot online
situs judi online
boswin168 slot online
agen slot bosswin168
bosswin168
slot bosswin168
mabar69
mabar69 slot online
mabar69 slot online
bosswin168
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
cocol77
ronin86
cocol77
cocol77
https://wowcamera.info/
mabar69
mahjong69
mahjong69
mahjong69
mabar69
master38
master38
master38
cocol88
bosswin168
mabar69
MASTER38 MASTER38 MASTER38 MASTER38 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 COCOL88 COCOL88 COCOL88 COCOL88 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 ZONA69 ZONA69 ZONA69 NOBAR69 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38
SLOT GACOR HARI INI SLOT GACOR HARI INI
BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168
BARON69
COCOL88
MAX69 MAX69 MAX69
COCOL88 COCOL88 LOGIN BARON69 RONIN86 DINASTI168 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 MABAR69 COCOL88
ronin86
bwtoto
bwtoto
bwtoto
master38
Prince Harry ordered to pay Daily Mail publisher's legal fees

A judge has ordered Prince Harry to pay the legal fees of the publisher of The Mail on Sunday tabloid for his failed court challenge in a libel lawsuit.

The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers Ltd over an article that said Harry tried to hide his efforts to retain publicly funded protection in the United Kingdom after leaving his role as a working member of the royal family.

Justice Matthew Nicklin ruled on Friday in the High Court in London that the publisher has a “real prospect” of showing that statements issued on Harry’s behalf were misleading and that the February 2022 article reflected an “honest opinion” and was not libellous.

Watch the latest news and stream for free on 7plus >>

“The defendant may well submit that this was a masterclass in the art of ‘spinning’,” Nicklin wrote, in refusing to strike the honest opinion defence.

Harry has claimed the article was “fundamentally inaccurate” and the newspaper defamed him when it suggested he lied in his initial public statements over efforts to challenge the government’s decision to strip him of his security detail after he and his family moved to the United States in 2020.

Harry, 39, the younger son of King Charles, also has a lawsuit pending against the government’s decision to protect him on a case-by-case basis when he visits the UK.

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex at the Variety Power of Women gala in Los Angeles (left); and with Prince Harry (right). Credit: Instagram (Variety)/Getty

He claims that hostility toward him and his wife on social media and relentless hounding by the news media threaten their safety.

Nicklin said a libel trial lasting three to four days will be scheduled between May 17 and July 31.

The nearly £50,000 ($A95,700) in legal fees Harry was ordered to pay by December 29 is likely to be dwarfed by the amount paid to lawyers in another lawsuit the duke has brought against the publisher.

Associated Newspapers is one of three UK tabloid publishers he is suing over claims they used unlawful means — such as deception, phone hacking or hiring private investigators — to try to dig up dirt on him.

The Mail publisher failed last month in its bid to throw out that lawsuit although it prevailed in getting some evidence barred from trial.

Nicklin — who is also hearing that case — is considering what to award in lawyers’ costs for each party’s respective wins.

Harry and co-claimants that include Elton John and Elizabeth Hurley said they spent £1.7 to prepare for and argue their case at a hearing over several days in March.

The publisher, meanwhile, is seeking up to £755,000.

New bombshell claims after racist royal scandal

Prince Harry’s astonishing claim on why he stepped back from royal duties sparks fury

COCOL88 GACOR77 RECEH88 NGASO77 TANGO77 PASUKAN88 MEWAHBET MANTUL138 EPICWIN138 WORTEL21 WORTEL21 WORTEL21 WORTEL21 WORTEL21